Showing posts with label Rosario Dawson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rosario Dawson. Show all posts

Saturday, 26 January 2013

Review LV - Kids

Review LV
Kids (1995)

I've seen one Larry Clark film - Ken Park. I'm also familiar with Harmony Korine besides his contribution to Ken Park as I have seen parts of his film Gummo. While you think you're prepared for one of their films, you never are. There is definitely no exception when it comes to their film Kids. I've wanted to watch this film for years because I heard it was so controversial, and while someone told me it was bad, I decided to delve into it anyway.

"Of course I care about you," is the statement that wins sixteen-year-old Telly (Leo Fitzpatrick) a thirteen-year-old's virginity one morning. You see, Telly has one goal in life, and that is to take as many girls' virginities as possible. Casper (Justin Pierce), one of Telly's friends, is encouraging of this behaviour, and Telly settles on screwing two virgins in one day, and his next victim is thirteen-year-old Darcy (Yakira Peguero). While the two meet up with their skater friends throughout the day, Jennie (Chloë Sevigny) and Ruby (Rosario Dawson) return to a clinic to see if they tested for any STDs. Ruby is quite the promiscuous teen, while Jennie only ever had sex with Telly. While it turns out Ruby is clean, Jennie tests positive for the HIV virus. Now Jennie must try and find Telly before he de-flowers another virgin.

If there was one thing I tried to escape in my high school years, it would be exactly what was portrayed in this film. That is, adolescents who encouraged drug abuse, whether it be alcohol or marijuana or stronger substances, and who attended house parties where sex was encouraged. While I know people who participated in such "festivities" (and still do) and I heard my fair share of stories, I never experienced it hands on. I guess maybe that's why I found Kids a bit unbelievable. I mean, some parts were head on, but others, like the scene involving Casper and Jennie at the end, just seems so ridiculous. I guess I'm just naive in that aspect. First off, the film captures the drug culture that teenage seems to be all about. I'm personally completely against usage, but I know that quite a few teenagers are accepting to it when it concerns drugs that aren't too extreme. Second, the film goes into the sexual side of teenagehood. This I can relate to more because all adolescents go through puberty at some point. Still, I was readily exposed to the lessons about "safe sex" practice, so hearing Ruby claim she had unprotected sex with six guys (I can't remember the number exactly, but it was high enough) was pretty shocking. Nonetheless, I know where I live, apparently we have one of the highest teenage pregnancies in the country, as well as the highest number of cases of gonnorrhea, syphilis, and chlamydia. Obviously safe sex isn't practiced as much as I hoped... Even though this film came out nearly twenty years ago, the subject matter it brings up is still true to today's kids. And that's a pretty scary thought. While I think the film was a bit extreme in representing youths, dumb it down a bit and you have painted a picture of today's society.

Even though the film arguably represented today's teenagers, it still wasn't very good. I mean, there's only so much I can take of guys objectifying women and other men. Sex is not the only thing kids talk about, so it became redundant really quickly. The acting was also not anything spectacular, but I was willing to expect that since most of the actors and actresses were picked off the street to do this film. But Chloë Sevigny, who I've seen actually do a great job in a role, was so... nothing. Her character doesn't have emotion, whether it be sadness or happiness. I mean, sure, she "cries", but you don't feel it. I was sitting there thinking that even I could do a better job, and that's a sad statement indeed. Rosario Dawson was good, which I expected, but Chloë Sevigny was such a disappointment. I can't see why the director would want her to act the way she did - it's just unnatural.

I'd give the film six point five stars on ten. It's a typical low-budget film that screams Larry Clark and Harmony Korine, so if you're fans of them, you'll love it. Still, it has pretty bad acting and focuses too much on too little. The characters aren't three dimensional enough, and since this film relies on them, without that, we only get a less than mediocre film.

Pirate Bay torrent (uncut version apparently)

Tuesday, 24 July 2012

Review XIX - Clerks II

Review XIX
Clerks II (2006)

A long time ago (two months ago), I reviewed Clerks from Kevin Smith. After watching and reviewing the film, I really got into the mood of watching the sequel again. I couldn't find it anywhere (I had put it on a DVD) and couldn't be bothered to re-download it. There was a huge thunderstorm last night, and I lost my Internet connection for a little while. I decided to watch a movie instead of playing Minecraft. During my search, I found Gentlemen Broncos, but more important, Clerks II! Thus I sat down to watch the sequel for the second time.

Dante (Brian O'Halloran) heads out to open the Quick Stop only to find that the store is on fire. Randall (Jeff Anderson), it turns out, left the coffee pot on after closing up. The two end up getting employed at Mooby's, a fast food restaurant, only to be surrounded, once again, by some new, weird, and annoying customers. Jay (Jason Mewes) and Silent Bob (Kevin Smith) are back, as well as some new friends including Dante's new fiancee, Emma (Jennifer Schwalbach Smith), Dante and Randall's boss, Becky (Rosario Dawson), and Elias (Trevor Fehrman), a very peculiar co-worker at Mooby's.

The first time I watched this film, I loved it. I loved it even more after watching it a second time because I got to re-hear jokes I found hilarious the first time, and appreciate them even more the second time. I also, cough, was also more informed about certain events that happen in the film since I last watched it, so it also added some more hilarity to the film. The acting is way better in this film than Clerks, and though the dialogue isn't necessarily as witty, it's still amazing, and I laughed a lot. I also liked the new characters that were added in, and I found I appreciated Jay and Silent Bob a lot more in this film. In Clerks, I found they were more of just a little side bit, but in this film, they were better incorporated with the main characters.

Overall I'd give the film an eight on ten, just as I did Clerks. I can't say which one I prefer because I felt both films were a bit different, but were both really good. While Clerks is more safe to watch around family and friends, I'm warning you that you should probably only watch this film with a close friend because it can be pretty graphic. Someone told me they watched it with their parents - by god, I feel for them.

Pirate Bay torrent