Showing posts with label Kerry Bishé. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kerry Bishé. Show all posts

Friday, 8 July 2016

Review CXXXVII - Grand Piano

Review 137
Grand Piano (2013)

Hey everyone! I'm sorry for my absence - it's been kind of a wild ride around here. I also haven't really sat down to watch any films, and then I re-watched Martin Scorsese's Cape Fear. I really wanted to review it, but my heart wasn't there. Sometimes I'm down to do a huge-ass review of the thing and look into it and analyse it, but it just means way too much time out of my day. So instead I opted to review Eugenio Mira's Grand Piano starring Elijah Wood, John Cusack, and Kerry Bishé. My sister's boyfriend brought up this film probably a year or two ago - I almost thought it was 2015 for a second, shit - and kept asking if I had watched it. I studied piano for years and, while I am no where close to being a concert pianist, I'm still kind of knowledgeable on the subject a bit. Anyway, I finally sat down to watch it last night after needing a film to play in the background as I prepped a card for my boyfriend. So onward!

Tom Selznick (Elijah Wood) is a well-renowned concert pianist who, five years prior, had screwed up a performance, leaving him with terrible stage fright. Deciding to break from his spell with the encouragement of his famous wife, Emma (Kerry Bishé), he returns to play on the piano of his great teacher, Patrick Godureaux, as a homage to his life after his recent passing. However, his usual stage fright is taken to a whole new level when a mysterious man threatens to kill his wife if he plays one wrong note.

So, yeah, it was cool. I thought it was a fun film. I think it goes without saying that the hand postures were a bit... strained in my opinion at times, but honestly, I was paying half a mind to it, so I think I missed a lot of the times where I got shots of Tom playing the piano. Of course there's the single one I knew from the trailer, but whatever, man - the point of the film was not the technical details of the playing of the piano. Just like in films, gun action is never accurate, but you don't pay mind to it, unless the film was about guns. In which case, maybe you might be upset. But there was some shit that bothered me if only because it was flat-out no. Number ONE - concert pianists don't use sheet music. I mean, maybe it happens on occasion, but seriously, this is not common. You're told of the performance and you memorise that shit, man. Even I memorised my piece for the last piano concert I did, and half the audience was under five (this was last year, so I was not under five, sniff). I know this was literally for the sake of the plot, but it was so bullshit. When he walked to the piano and the guy stops him and he's like, "You almost forgot your partitions!" I was more baffled that Tom even needed them than he'd forget them. Apparently the director studied piano, so this is a big no-no. I would have tried to implement the threats in another manner than the sheet music because seriously. That was too bullshit. Fake the piano playing, cool, but not the sheet music! Here, check this video of Marc-André Hamelin, a well-known and super famous pianist, playing an all Liszt concert. Liszt has some pretty technically difficult pieces, and do I see any sheet music? No. Here's Yundi Li playing at a famous competition at eighteen years old (skipped to my favourite part). Any sheet music? No, and here he was making a name for himself. Just...

Now, again, you practice like crazy before the concert to memorise that piano piece, yet Tom does a three-sixty when the killa asks him to change the final piece. First, the orchestra's like, "Yeah, cool, man, no problem." And Tom just memorised the piece once he realises he doesn't have the sheet music. So you can't play the freakin' piece you're playing for the concert and you need the sheet music, but the most difficult piece in the world - which you haven't played in years and is, again, the most difficult piece - no worries, that one is down. I think I remember the killa saying the thing is fast and technical and les accords plaqués are huge or something, but anyway, you really take away from the difficulty of the piece if Tom just has it memorised. I know he played that concert five years ago, but five years is a long time! I'm not saying Tom wouldn't remember anything, and I'm sure there's a theoretical aspect to the piece where he might be like, "Yeah, man, it follows the cycle des quintes," but BULLSHIT. This guy is also not at all distracted by the fact people might die around him and performs extraordinarily well, but you know, whatever, it'll help him remember. You would still need to practice it. And the orchestra - Jesus, are you kidding me? If you were willing to believe that Tom somehow knew the whole thing, then how does the orchestra know their bit down one hundred percent? And honestly, that conductor - the most jokester one I've ever heard, but it's okay, I liked it. Still, seems off to me.

I know I'm butchering this shit, but honestly, I couldn't review this film without mentioning anything. I mean, I understand it was necessary for plot, but I need realism here! And I guess I have one other point to mention - the killa's like, "You play other people's music. You're so unimaginative!" I know this isn't supposed to be taken as a literal argument, but this isn't a Beatles cover band, man. If we didn't have concert pianists and musicians to record this stuff, we'd never get to hear the beautiful works of Ravel, of Vivaldi, of Messiaen (oh, Messiaen and Pierre-Laurent Aimard). We could never go out and enjoy concerts of lovely (and not so lovely) pianists interpreting wonderful music. And let me tell you that pianists - and musicians in general - never take a piece and spew out something exactly like everyone else. Compare Gould's performance of Sonata No. 3, Op. 58, fourth movement from Chopin and Blechacz's performance. Different, isn't it? I took polar opposites here since Gould is always Bach-ing things up, but even if that is too subtle for you, listen to Led Zeppelin's live performance of Stairway to Heaven and then Frank Zappa doing a cover. Damn, son, kind of different, eh? Now, the point of grand pianists is to stay true to the original musician, but if the piece was written five hundred years ago, there is room for some interpretation. So don't listen to this locksmith talking shit. I'm guessing no one else particularly cared about this, but whatever, I still wanted to make a point.

Now, in the end, if you look at face value, the film does make a great point that, in my experience as an amateur pianist, the audience doesn't hear when you make mistakes. You can't play a piece perfectly - if you get it down technically, you could be missing soul. If you add soul, you maybe miss out on a note or a proper pause. But in the end, the little errors mean nothing to the audience. Granted, if I was in the audience and I knew the piece and the last note was a mistake, that would probably be different, but otherwise, you're there to play the music and enjoy it, not worry about making mistakes. The audience is mostly made up of noobs who enjoy the music, not teachers hounding down on you for screwing up somewhere. So that message really was great for pianists and musicians alike, I'm sure. Slight spoilers but honestly, the whole time I was wondering, "Couldn't he just play the last four bars slow...?" What if it wasn't exactly exact given everyone has a different interpretation of playing a piece? But whatever, I think I thought about this film too much.

Grand Piano was pretty flawed in its technical aspects, but it was still an interesting thriller. And I was dying, i.e. laughing, when I found out who the killa was (I literally knew nothing going in). To be honest, the voice was pretty nice - the deepness was just right, especially with the noise of the microphone, and the threatening speech just enhanced the beauty. I don't think I'll ever look at the actor the same ever again... Sigh.

Monday, 14 January 2013

Review XLIV - Argo

Review XLIV
Argo (2012)

I remember when I saw the trailer for Ben Affleck's Argo, I didn't seem too impressed. I couldn't remember exactly what the film was about, minus that the main character, played by Ben Affleck, was making a fake movie for some reason. When I saw that it had been pretty widely acclaimed (and this was only recently) and was based on a true event (which I saw in the trailer, but I always take these claims with a grain of salt), I decided I should give it a shot (uhh... no pun intended). I was probably being hasty on my judgement because I didn't want to end up seeing a bad movie. Anyway, let's review this baby!

Though it seems almost too comical to be true, this film is based on true accounts. The film begins with militants and civilians storming into the American embassy in Iran's capital, Tehran on November 4th, 1979, in support of the Iranian revolution (it's explained in the film so I won't go in depth). Six, out of the fifty-eight Americans that were there, manage to escape and are taken into the home of the Canadian ambassador, Ken Taylor (played by Victor Garber). The six Americans are Tate Donovan), Lee Schatz (Rory Cochrane), Mark Lijek (Christopher Denham), Cora Lijek (Clea DuVall), Joe Stafford (Scoot McNairy), and Kathy Stafford (Kerry Bishé) However, the American government realises that it won't be long before the Iranians find out six have escaped, so they need a plan to get them out. Enter Tony Mendez (Ben Affleck), a CIA specialist, who disagrees with all the ideas of having them pose as teachers in Iran. He comes up with an idea when he puts Battle for the Planet of the Apes on to watch it with his son. The idea? To pretend to make a film that is being filmed in Iran and have the six escapees as the crew. With the help of his supervisor, Jack O'Donnell (Bryan Cranston), a Hollywood make-up artist who has done previous work with the CIA, John Chambers (John Goodman), and the great film producer, Lester Siegel (Alan Arkin), they may just be able to pull off the greatest fake film of all time - Argo.

First of all, I really like the cover for the film. I find it very expressive and the contrasting blue and red colour make it an interesting view. It's not really necessary for the critique of the film, but I just thought I'd mention it. Ahhh, Ben Affleck, haha.

Anyway, the film is definitely interesting. You get the perspective of the six Americans held captive in Iran and how stressed they are, and then we get the perspective of the CIA trying their best to come up with a good idea. When the film idea is pitched, it is initially put down, but in the end, seems to be their best bet to get their fellow people out. While this is obviously simply based on true events and thus some aspects are dramatised, this was not - they actually pretended to make a fake movie to get these people out. These real life events just seem like a good plot to put on film, and with Ben Affleck's directing, it was really well done. It was suspenseful and really crazy at some points, but mostly, heartfelt. Tony Mendez went on a line with his life doing this, and so did Ken Taylor with actually accepting them in after they had been turned down by other embassies. Just a little tidbit, but apparently Lee Schatz actually stayed with the Swedish embassy for a week before joining the rest of the group. Ben Affleck went ahead and commented that this demonstrated real international relationships between nations, with risks of their lives and their stature, and I couldn't have said it better. The film captures this very well, as well as the suspenseful bits. Even though I knew what would happen, I was still yelling as I watched the film. It also had some funny aspects ("Argo fuck yourself!"), which made it even more appealing. I'd also like to say, as a side note, that, while it doesn't place Iran in the best of terms, it isn't fair to criticise it for doing so. The film is seen from the American perspective, and while Iranians did attack the U.S. embassy as a revolt for reasons that maybe you support, it can still be considered a good movie. It mostly focuses on how they got the Americans out, and, again, this is a film from the American side of things as it is based on an article written by an American. If you're going to simply boycott watching the film because it is biased, you're missing out.

The film's plot was really interesting, but I couldn't say the acting was really all that exceptional. It wasn't bad, not in the least, but it wasn't exceptional. I really enjoyed Alan Arkin's performance, but Ben Affleck's performance wasn't anything extraordinary. The six Americans also didn't have exceptional performances. Again, I have to reiterate that the performances were good, but they were not anything really remarkable, minus the great crabby portrayal of Lester Siegel from Alan Arkin. Still way better than I could have been, though!

The film was a really interesting piece of history, and I thought it was a really good film. The plot was great, and the acting was good, so I guess the film gets eight point five stars on ten. It's not my typical kind of film, but it was enjoyable nonetheless. Now I'd like to see the "real" Argo come out!

Pirate Bay torrent